End Transgenic Trespass - Legal Documents

The Amended Complaint filed on June 1, 2011 following an exchange of letters between the attorneys after the filing of the original complaint at the end of March, 2011. The letter written to Monsanto's attorneys said the lawsuit could go away if they would provide a binding covenant to replace the undefined and unenforceable promise Monsanto made not to sue over “trace,” “inadvertent” contamination.

Response Brief to the Monsanto Motion to Dismiss

Amicus Brief Supporting Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss

Official Transcript of the Oral Arguments on January 31, 2012 before Judge Naomi R. Buchwald of the Federal District Court of Southern New York

Corrected Transcript of the Oral Arguments on January 31, 2012 before Judge Naomi Buchwald (with the correction of several transcription errors shown in parentheses)

Ruling by Judge Buchwald on the Motion to Dismiss, issued on February 24, 2012

Appeal Brief filed with the Appeals Court of the Federal Circuit on July 5, 2012

Amicus Brief filed by Non-Profit Organizations with the Appeals Court of the Federal Circuit filed on July 11, 2012

Amicus Brief filed by Law Professors with the Appeals Court of the Federal Circuit filed on July 12, 2012

Response to the Monsanto Response filed with the Appeals Court of the Federal Circuit on September 27, 2012

Transcript of the Oral Arguments before the Appeals Court of the Federal Circuit in
Washington, D.C. on January 10, 2013 before Judges Dyk, Bryson, and Moore

Recording of the Oral Arguments before the Appeals Court of the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. on January 10, 2013 before Judges Dyk, Bryson, and Moore

Decision by Judges Dyk, Bryson, and Moore of the Appeals Court of the Federal Circuit on the appeal of the dismissal decision by Judge Buchwald, issued on June 10, 2013

The Petition to the Supreme Court for Review of the Lower Court Decisions, filed on September 5, 2013

The Response to Monsanto's Opposition Brief filed with the Supreme Court on December 19, 2013